Lobb-E — Legislative Response Copilot

Setup

Briefing

Position

Outputs

0 analyses

Analyses run

3 analyses total

Unlimited

Find or paste a bill

Searches the current legislative session. Supports bill number or keyword search.

Bill number

Jurisdiction

Sponsor (optional)

Bill title (optional)

Bill text *

Your organization

Organization name

Organization type

Your members or sector (optional)

Focuses the analysis on provisions most relevant to your organization. Does not set a position.

Policy priorities or pre-drafted positions optional

Show▾

Informs the analysis — does not override independent review.

What do you need?

📋

Briefing

Stakeholder analysis — direct effects, risks, and open questions. For decision-makers.

💬

Plain Language

Human-readable explanation with practical examples. For boards, parents, staff.

📣

Advocacy

Run briefing first, then generate emails, testimony, talking points, and more.

17 outputs unlock after analysis: Testimony · Talking points · Sponsor email · Coalition memo · Slide deck · Social posts · Press release · and more

Analysis depth

⚙ Advanced settings Model selection · auto-configured by default

Show▾

Models are automatically selected based on bill complexity. Override here if needed.

Analysis Model — generates the brief

Review Model — second-pass consistency check

Outputs Model — advocacy products

Legislative Briefing

Two-pass fast pipeline · One model · Clean grounded brief

Analyzing

Preparing your briefing

Starting analysis...

⬡ Initializing...

Generate

Review

💾 Save this analysis as a project:

Legislative Briefing

Draft Legislation

⚠Verify before citing externally

AI-generated analysis using a two-pass pipeline: a primary model drafts the brief, a second model reviews it for consistency and flags overreach. Cost figures, timelines, and numeric estimates are not sourced data — assumptions are noted in Sources & Assumptions. Verify before external use. Generated by:

ℹHow to read this brief

Direct effect Language like "The bill requires / authorizes / prohibits" — drawn directly from the bill text. These are grounded facts.

Practical implication Language like "In practice, this may mean / this could require" — reasonable operational inference, clearly labeled as such.

Unresolved Language like "The bill does not specify / it is unclear whether" — genuine statutory ambiguity. The brief stops here and does not invent an answer.

Ready to share or file for documentation

≡Reviewer Record

Separate analyses with timestamps

Show▾

Pipeline traces: Pass 1 (Generated Brief), Validator Result, and Final Brief are shown below.

Pass 1 · Segmentation

Model · Time

Pass 2 · Extraction

Model · Time

⊞

Validator Result

Model · Time

Final Brief

Model · Time

Bill Section Index

Operative sections identified directly from the bill text — what the AI actually read and grounded this analysis in.

Bill Text

Full bill text.

No bill text available.

Confidence Level Guide

HIGHDirectly stated in the bill text with a specific section citation. You can verify it yourself.

MEDIUMReasonably inferred from bill language. Plausible but not explicitly stated — verify before citing.

LOWExtrapolation or assumption not directly supported by the bill text. Treat as a flag to investigate, not a fact.

Legislative Briefing

Preparing your briefing

Position & Outputs

Advocacy Package

Previous Projects

Compare Bill Versions

Comparing bill versions